Licensing for sharing and trading
content: Working models?
Phillip Crisp,
Special Counsel, Australian Government Solicitors
New publishing paradigms and the ‘Free-for Education’ licence
Link to presentation and
FfE licence
model
This paper explains the rules and rationale of the new
AEShareNet-FfE (‘Free-for-Education’) Licence Protocol. It
places the new protocol into perspective by:
- briefly examining the historical evolution of publishing
models from relatively proprietary to the new paradigm
described as ‘open source / open content’
- explaining those fundamental structures and concepts
underlying AEShareNet which are helpful in understanding
the AEShareNet-FfE
licence protocol.
Philip Crisp is an IP specialist with many years policy
and practical experience. He wrote the current Commonwealth
Guidelines
relating to Management and Commercialisation of Intellectual
Property in the field of Information Technology (‘the
IT IP Guidelines’). In 2001 he was awarded an Australia
Day Medallion for his contributions to public sector IP
management.
Philip has built a specialist practice advising the education
sector on copyright and other issues arising from information
and communications technologies, including:
- conceiving and developing the AEShareNet system
- an innovative solution for web-based copyright management
in the VET sector;
- investigating the legal issues associated with
flexible learning, leading to the publication of a major
report, Legal and Regulatory
Framework for Flexible Learning;
-
advising DEST on educational copyright issues raised by the ‘Digital
Agenda’ and the US Free Trade Agreement;
- acting for The Le@rning Federation (TLF) in the
design and negotiation of copyright arrangements for Content
developed
under the TLF Initiative.
Back to top^
Ian Oi,
Special Counsel, Blake Dawson Waldron
iCommons: Creative Commons, Australian version
This session introduces the licensing model for the
Creative Commons project, in the context of the Australian
implementation of the Creative Commons licences. It includes
a summary of the background and objectives of Creative Commons,
describes similarities and differences between the Creative
Commons project and licences and other open content projects.
Ian Oi is a special counsel in the Canberra office of Blake
Dawson Waldron who practices primarily in the area of
information technology, communications, intellectual property
and cyberlaw.
For a number of years, he has particularly focussed on
the development, licensing, distribution and management
of open content and open source software. Amongst other
things, Ian is co-project lead (and leader of drafting
team) for the iCommons Australia project, which promotes
the Creative Commons licences in Australia. Ian has also
drafted contractual frameworks for the development and
deployment of open source software, and open source
software licences in an Australian environment.
Back to top^
Licensing multiple layers of intellectual Property
to the school sector
Link to materials.
The Le@rning Federation (TLF) is is an initiative of State
and Federal governments of Australia and New Zealand. Over
the period 2001-2006 the Initiative aims to develop online
interactive curriculum content specifically for Australian
and New Zealand schools.
TLF's
curriculum content contains multiple layers of licensed-in
third party material and TLF commissioned works. The presentation
will provide a map of TLF's end-to-end licensing regime,
focussing on how the licensing regime allows users to build
complex layers and compositions of intellectual property.
The presentation will also discuss how TLF communicates special
conditions to end users in dynamic conditions of use statements.
Dr
Nigel Ward,
The Le@rning Federation
Nigel Ward is "Interoperability Analyst" at
The Le@rning Federation - an initiative of State and Federal
governments of Australia and New Zealand that is developing
online interactive curriculum content specifically for Australian
and New Zealand schools. At the Le@rning Federation, Nigel
is responsible for creating technical specifications for
the initiative's content and systems. These specifications
aim
to ensure that the initiative's content is usable across
a range of systems and in a range of contexts.
In a previous life, Nigel was a
lead researcher on a project investigating context-sensitive
ways of satisfing the information needs of people in complex
information environments. In a life before that, he worked
in a research group designing formal methods for the development
of real-time software systems. His PhD is titled "A
Refinement Calculus for Nondeterministic Expressions."
Back to top^
Nicky
Pitkanen,
The Le@rning Federation
Nicky Pitkanen is the Business and Process
Analyst with The Le@rning Federation - an initiative of State
and Federal governments of Australia and New Zealand that
is developing online interactive curriculum content specifically
for Australian and New Zealand schools. Nicky is responsible
for identifying the business and functional requirements
for infrastructure systems and integrating the systems and
processes into the organisation. The systems include content
management, intellectual property rights management and basic
learning management.
Previously,
Nicky worked as a functional architect consultant for business
and IT system consulting companies in Australia, Finland
and United Kingdom, where she was involved in the business
and functional system design for mainly web-based business
applications within various industries.
Back to top^
Peter Eckersley,
Intellectual Property Research Institute of Australia (APRIA)
Funding the Development of Free & Open Source
Software
Link to materials.
One of the central economic questions which surrounds free
software is whether and how the benefits of liberal licensing
can be combined with timely, user-driven financial support
for development. There are several kinds of innovative business
models which can allow developers to earn money from meeting
a consumers' demand for free software. One, sometimes termed
a "bounty market" or the "Wall
St. Performer Protocol", involves decentralised ex ante
contracts between coders and user communities. Another, called "dual" or "two-tiered" licensing,
can fund the development of free software libraries by using
a strong copyleft (usually the GPL) with the alternative
of a paid-up license for clients linking to proprietary code.
I will review the theoretical stengths and limitations of
these models, the experiences to date which free software
communities have had with them, and the prospects for widespread
deployment in the future.
Peter Eckersley is a PhD student and digital technology
researcher, at the Intellectual Property Research Institute
of Australia, and the Department of Computer Science and
Software Engineering, at the University of Melbourne. His
research interests include interactions between public "open
science" and proprietary R&D;
the role of copyright, patent and trade secret rules in determining
the organisation of software production, and the possibility
of alternatives to DRM-based copyright for digital culture.
Session Chair:
Dr Roger Clarke, Xamax Consultancy
Back to top^
|