Friday, July 06, 2007
Those of you who have been paying (very) close attention would have noticed that there was one thing missing from yesterday's post - the very same topic on which I've been published: quantification of online commons.
This is set to be a continuing theme in my research. Not because it's particularly valuable in the field of computer science, but because in the (very specific) field of online commons research, no one else seems to be doing much. (If you know something I don't about where to look for the research on this, please contact me now!)
I wish I could spend more time on this. What I'd do if I could would be another blog post altogether. Suffice it to say that I envisaged a giant machine (completely under my control), frantically running all over the Internets counting documents and even discovering new types of licences. If you want to hear more, contact me, or leave a comment here and convince me to post on it specifically.
So what do I have to say about this? Actually, so much that the subject has its own page. It's on unlockingip.org, here. It basically surveys what's around on the subject, and a fair bit of that is my research. But I would love to hear about yours or any one else's, published, unpublished, even conjecture.
Just briefly, here's what you can currently find on the unlockingip.org site:
I'm also interested in the methods of quantification. With the current technologies, what is the best way to find out, for any given licence, how many documents (copyrighted works) are available with increased public rights? This is something I need to put to Creative Commons, because their licence statistics page barely addresses this issue.
This is set to be a continuing theme in my research. Not because it's particularly valuable in the field of computer science, but because in the (very specific) field of online commons research, no one else seems to be doing much. (If you know something I don't about where to look for the research on this, please contact me now!)
I wish I could spend more time on this. What I'd do if I could would be another blog post altogether. Suffice it to say that I envisaged a giant machine (completely under my control), frantically running all over the Internets counting documents and even discovering new types of licences. If you want to hear more, contact me, or leave a comment here and convince me to post on it specifically.
So what do I have to say about this? Actually, so much that the subject has its own page. It's on unlockingip.org, here. It basically surveys what's around on the subject, and a fair bit of that is my research. But I would love to hear about yours or any one else's, published, unpublished, even conjecture.
Just briefly, here's what you can currently find on the unlockingip.org site:
- My SCRIT-ed paper
- My research on the initial uptake of the Creative Commons version 2.5 (Australia) licence
- Change in apparent Creative Commons usage, June 2006 - March 2007
- Creative Commons semi-official statistics
I'm also interested in the methods of quantification. With the current technologies, what is the best way to find out, for any given licence, how many documents (copyrighted works) are available with increased public rights? This is something I need to put to Creative Commons, because their licence statistics page barely addresses this issue.
Labels: ben, quantification, research
Comments:
Links to this post:
<< Home
Jordan said:
Giorgos Cheliotis at Singapore is doing some stats work on trying to determine use of CC licences, as is of course Mike Linksvayer at CC. Cheliotis gave a presentation at the iSummit on where he is at in his research. His presentation should be up on the web.
Post a Comment
Giorgos Cheliotis at Singapore is doing some stats work on trying to determine use of CC licences, as is of course Mike Linksvayer at CC. Cheliotis gave a presentation at the iSummit on where he is at in his research. His presentation should be up on the web.
Links to this post:
<< Home