Faculty of Law
Regulation of Online Investing (Laws 3088)
COURSE
INFORMATION AND TIMETABLE
LECTURER : Prof. Dimity Kingsford Smith
Room 1142
Ph: 9385 2245
e-mail :
d.kingsfordsmith@unsw.edu.au
CLASSES: Semester 2, 2006, Tuesdays 6-8pm.
CLASS VENUE: AGSM
City Premises, O’Connell St, Sydney, 2000.
There
are 1.5 million online investors in Australia, and the ASX estimates that 30%
of all trades are done by electronic means. Privatisations, demutualisations and
compulsory superannuation choice and investment mean that most Australians will
be active in the investment markets at some time in their lives. Attracted by
convenience and low fees, many will invest online. There is now a substantial
body of law and policy in the area of financial regulation, addressed
specifically to online financial transactions and to the fact that most markets
are electronic and no longer traditional.
The course will begin with an introduction
to the Internet and the institutions and new business types that have grown up
around the online investing industry. It will then consider the relevance of
the Australian Financial Services Licensing provisions to these online market
operators. The course will go on to consider the operating conditions of online
brokers, and the legal and practical implications of their customer relations.
The subsequent parts of the course will cover public securities and financial
products offerings and electronic offering documents, the challenges to traditional
exchanges from alternative trading systems and electronic communications
networks and how these might be regulated. Internet fraud, market manipulation
and misleading and deceptive conduct in online financial services will be
covered next followed up by an analysis of the enforcement and liability
implications of a number of the topics previously considered during the course.
As the course proceeds it will tackle a
number of issues which have particular salience in the online context: online
investing from an international, rather then simply Australian perspective.
Behavioral finance and what it and other research on user’s responses to the
Internet tell us about online investor decision-making and the implications for
regulation; restructuring of financial relationships and the loss of regulatory
‘gate-keepers’ eg the loss of advisory brokers; the implications for regulation
of the overwhelming amounts of financial information available, much of it for
free; the appearance of new actors such as day-traders who combine the
attributes of professional and non-professional investors; the difficulties of
regulating an inter-jurisdictional industry taking account of developments in
other countries and through trans-national bodies such as IOSCO. Some observations
on regulatory policy and practice in relation to online delivery of financial
services will also be explored as they arise.
Classes will combine some lecturing with
mainly seminar discussion format, based on prepared materials. A set of reading
materials will be available and students will be expected to have read and
considered these in response to questions in the reading guide, in advance of
class.
Students will have a mix of assessment
options, primarily a research essay, some team work assessment tasks for class
participation as the course progresses (eg class presentation), and a short
piece of writing to be handed in at the end of week 6 of the course, outlining
the student’s essay topic and approach.
The course will be offered drawing on the
expertise and connections of the Australian Research Council Discovery online
investing project already underway in the UNSW Law Faculty. More information
and resources can be found at www.cyberlawcentre.org/onlineinvesting/
1 |
25 July |
Introduction (week 1)
|
2 |
1 August |
The institutions and
businesses of online investing (week 2)
·
Understanding
the context of an online investing transaction
|
3 |
8 August |
Who needs a financial
services licence? (week 3)
|
4 |
15 August |
License and operating
conditions for online investing sites (week 4)
|
|
||
5 |
22 August |
Customer relations and
online investing sites (week 5)
|
6 |
29 August |
Public offerings and
electronic offer documents (weeks 6 & 7)
·
Corporate
fundraising and electronic prospectuses, including multi-media offer
documents
|
7 |
5 September |
Public offerings and
electronic offer documents (weeks 6 & 7)
·
Financial
products and electronic product disclosure statements
·
The particular
case of superannuation offered online
|
8 |
12 September |
The challenge to
traditional stock exchanges: automated trading systems and electronic
communication networks (week 8)
|
9 |
19 September |
Fraud, market manipulation and misleading conduct
in online investing (weeks 9 & 10)
|
break 10 |
Weeks 25 September & 2 October (Week 10) |
Mid-session break Law Faculty Reading Week
(for essays etc) |
11 |
10 October |
Fraud, market
manipulation and
misleading conduct in online investing (weeks 9 & 10)
|
12 |
17 October |
Enforcement
and liability (week 11)
ASIC
·
Limits of international principles – IOSCO
principles – Memoranda of Understanding (MOU) – global
networks of regulatory principles.
|
24
October |
The future? (week 12)
§
Day traders – professional or ordinary investors? §
Education and building financial capacity in the
online investor? §
General or personal advice online – a distinction
without a difference? §
Is online trading just gambling, dressed up as
investment? §
Does this subject have a future – won’t it be just
securities and financial services regulation again, because soon we will all
invest this way? |
|
14 |
30
October |
Revision and essay return
|
TEACHING METHOD
Classes will combine lecture format and seminar discussion
based upon prepared materials. A detailed Reading List will be made available
to those who enrol in the course. There is no text book which adequately covers
this area. Materials will be made
available at the beginning of the semester, probably by Web-CT. Students will
be expected to have read the assigned materials in advance of each class.
1 |
Short written
outline of essay, 1000 words Due
date: September 2006. |
10% of final
assessment |
2 |
Short class presentation
and general class participation; Date
to be arranged in class |
30% of final
assessment |
3 |
Compulsory
research essay of 5,000 words |
60% of final
assessment |
1. Short
written outline of essay (10% of assessment): The due
date for the essay outline is September 2006.
2. Compulsory
Research Essay Question (60% of assessment):
The compulsory research essay of 5,000
words is due December 2006. Students are
encouraged to choose a topic of their own. It may be helpful to choose
something in an area of work interest, or which reflects their own experience
in another way – eg arising from having online investing as a hobby or
interest. The topic should be one which raises contemporary issues of
regulatory or public interest significance or which has legal impact on
investor’s rights or the working of the markets (broadly understood). Students
are reminded that this is a master of laws course, and that credit will be
given for legal and regulatory policy and legal theoretical arguments. Credit
will not be given for simple description of the law, nor for pure description
of the online investing context – the aim is to encourage analysis of real
regulatory problems and what might be done about them.
3. Short
Class Presentation and Class Participation (30% of assessment): The course will be run with an initial
introduction of approximately 30 minutes of the 2 hour seminar each week. The
remaining 1.5 hours will be for discussion. In the Reading Guide for the course
there are a number of questions for discussion each week. Each week the groups
formed at the beginning of the course will choose from the listed questions,
and make a short (5 minute) presentation in response to the chosen
question. The group should be prepared
to lead in discussion in a general way for the whole of the remainder of the
class at which it makes its presentation.
a) A
compulsory presentation.
Students
will be assigned a class and will be expected to provide the rest of the class
with a short presentation on the topic of the night. Further details about this exercise will be
given to students in the first lecture, when the assignment of classes will
also be addressed.
b) Participation
in class over the course of the semester.
Attendance
at all classes will not guarantee a pass grade for this component of the
course. Your mark will be based upon the
quality, not quantity of your contributions. You will be rewarded for oral
contributions which demonstrate that you have read the assigned materials and
reflected on the issues raised. This
includes coming to class prepared with questions about issues that you have not
understood or which you think require further discussion, as well as
participation in any class discussions of problem exercises or other in-class
exercises that may take place from time to time.
At the end of session, we will ask each of you to
assess your contribution to class in writing according to set criteria and
giving reasons. While we are not bound by your self-assessment, we will take it
into account and if your mark differs significantly from that which you think
you deserve you can request reasons why.
SPECIAL NOTE: Students who believe they have
difficulties in making oral presentations or speaking in class should discuss
this with the lecturer.
Criteria for Assessment of Class Participation
·
Substantive dimensions of assessment are
similar to those used in assessing written work. Students should seek to show that
they understand the application of, and underlying reason for the use of, the
skills emphasised in the lectures.
·
Students will be
assessed on the quality rather than the quantity of their contributions.
Nevertheless, it is difficult to award marks to students who are absent or who
do not participate in the lecture discussion and exercises. In order to obtain
a passing grade, it is ordinarily essential to:
i) attend regularly;
ii) enthusiastically participate in the lecture discussions
and exercises.
·
The following
descriptions are of "typical" levels of performance in certain
categories of marks. The categories are based on total marks of 20 for class
performance:
0 - 4: Unacceptable level of absence from classes. Participation virtually
non-existent. Little, if any, preparation apparent. Obvious lack of commitment
to the unit.
4.5 - 9.5: Irregular attendance without explanation. Inconsistent
preparation. Evidences a poor understanding of the application of, and
underlying reason for the use of, the skills emphasised in the classes.
10 - 14: Regular attendance, with reasonable level of preparation.
Participates in class discussions, but sometimes exhibits a lack of
comprehension of the topic. Adequate participation in class exercises.
14.5 - 16.5: Regular attendance and preparation. Either a good deal of
participation of variable quality or less participation but good quality.
Demonstrates a reasonable comprehension of topics under consideration.
17 - 20: Regular attendance. High quality participation based upon
thorough preparation. Demonstrates an excellent comprehension of topics under
consideration. Evidence of capacity to develop innovative approaches to such
topics.
ACADEMIC
ASSISTANCE
The Learning Centre at the University of New South
Wales provides Online Academic Skills
Resources at http://www.lc.unsw.edu.au/olib.html
to help students develop skills in areas such as essay and assignment writing.
The Learning Centre also offers individual assistance for any study-related
concern to all UNSW students enrolled in degree programs. You can make an
appointment for help with academic writing on an individual basis. The Learning Centre does not teach English,
however you can use the Learning Centre resources to improve your
language. The resource library can be
accessed at http://www.lc.unsw.edu.au/ILC.html. Any students wanting English language tuition
should inquire at the Institute of Languages, whose homepage can be found at http://www.lang.unsw.edu.au.
UNIVERSITY
POLICY ON ASSESSMENTS AND ACADEMIC MISCONDUCT
Information produced by the UNSW Law School regarding
assessments can be located at http://www.law.unsw.edu.au/current_students/admininfo/assessment.asp. Please pay particular attention to the
penalties for submitting assignments after the due date or exceeding word
limits.
The UNSW Academic Misconduct Policy can be viewed at
https://my.unsw.edu.au/student/academiclife/assessment/AcademicMisconductStudentMisconduct.html
Students should familiarise themselves with these
policies and consult them throughout the course when needed.
·
Corporations Act 2001, the 2006 edition.
·
Baxt R, Black A,
Hanrahan P, Securities and Financial Services Law (Butterworths, 2003).
·
Collection of
reading materials for this course.
·
Kinsky, R, Online Investing On the Australian
Sharemarket (2nd edition, 2005; Wrightbooks).
·
H M Friedman Securities Regulation
in Cyberspace (2004 Aspen)
·
J F Olsen & H L Pitt Securities
in the Electronic Age: A Practical Guide to the Law and Regulation (Glasser
Legal Works, 2000)
·
CLERP: Paper No. 6, Financial
Markets and Investment Products,1997.
·
Tomasic, Roman,
Bottomley, Stephen, and McQueen, Rob, Corporations
Law in Australia (2nd ed, 2002)
·
Walker, Gordon, Fisse,
Brent and Ramsay, Ian (ed), Securities
Regulation in Australia and New Zealand (LBC, 2nd ed, 1998)
·
Walker, Gordon & Fisse,
Brent (ed), Securities Regulation in
Australia and New Zealand (Oxford, 1st ed, 1994)
·
Braithwaite J and Drahos
P, Global Business Regulation (CUP,
2000)
·
Baldwin, Robert and Cave,
Martin, Understanding Regulation (Oxford, 1999).
·
Financial System Inquiry
Discussion Paper (November 1996).
·
Financial System Inquiry
Final Report (March 1997).
·
International
Organisation of Securities Commissions (IOSCO), Multilateral Memorandum of Understanding, Concerning Consultation &
Cooperation and the Exchange of Information (May 2002)
<http://www.iosco.org/iosco.html>
·
International
Organisation of Securities Commissions (IOSCO), Objectives and Principles of Securities Regulation, (February 2002)
<http://www.iosco.org/iosco.html>
·
Loss, Louis, Fundamentals of Securities Regulation,
(2001).
Cyber-securities
Law Institute, Faculty of Law, University of Toledo, USA:
http://law.utoledo.edu/Cybersecurities/
John
Stark Reed, Head Cyber-enforcement, Securities and Exchange Commission, Washington
DC, USA:
http://www.johnreedstark.com/
Australian
Securities and Investments Commission, especially those items dealing with
online investing:
http://www.asic.gov.au/
http://www.asic.gov.au/asic/pdflib.nsf/LookupByFileName/online_trading.pdf/$file/online_trading.pdf
Australian
Securities and Investments Commission, FIDO web-page:
http://www.fido.asic.gov.au/
Securities
Exchange Commission, Washington DC, USA:
http://www.sec.gov/
Financial
Services Authority, London, UK:
http://www.fsa.gov.uk/
http://fsahandbook.info/FSA/index.jsp
Australian Online Investing Websites listed
in chapter 3 of Kinsky, R, Online
Investing On the Australian Sharemarket (2nd edition, 2005;
Wrightbooks), or those at
http://cyberlawcentre.org/onlineinvesting/refs/refs-I.html
Attendance
at classes is compulsory. If you attend
less than 80% of classes without reasonable excuse you may be refused final
assessment.
If your
performance is affected by illness or misadventure you should notify your
teacher as soon as possible, preferably with a medical certificate or other
documentary evidence of your special circumstances.
If you fail
to submit work for assessment on time you will find that marks will be deducted
for lateness, unless you have obtained an extension from me prior to the date
for submission. The penalty applied will
be at the rate of 5% of the marks for each day or part thereof that the essay
is late up to a maximum of 50% penalty.
All work
submitted in this course for assessment must be your own work. It should not be written in collaboration
with any other student, lawyer or professional person to whom you may have
access. You may of course in preparing
work for assessment, consult your teacher and the Law Librarians.
All work
submitted in this course for assessment must have been generated for this
course alone. In other words, you should
not submit for assessment work which you may have completed for another course
or professional requirement.
Plagiarism
(the use of another person’s words and ideas without appropriate
acknowledgement) will not be tolerated.
You must observe the Faculty rules on plagiarism. For further information, please refer to the
Faculty’s information section, Academic Misconduct, at the following address: http://www.law.unsw.edu.au/Current_Students/adminInfo/misconduct/index.asp
Strict word
limits will apply to all assessed work.
In calculating the number of words, all text, footnotes (including
citations of references), tables, and appendices will be included. The bibliography will not be included in the
word limit.
Penalties
will apply to assessed work which exceeds the word limit as follows:
0-10% |
No penalty |
11-29% |
15%
penalty |
30% and
over |
30%
penalty |
Your teacher
in Financial Services Regulation is committed to ensuring that all marking is
fair and comparable across all class groups.
All HD and fail papers are double-marked. Your teacher will also be expected to produce
roughly similar marking profiles for their classes.
If you wish
to query a mark awarded to you for any of your assessment tasks, you must
follow this procedure:
·
Approach
your teacher no earlier than three days after the assessment task is returned
to you to request feedback. Your teacher
will provide you with feedback on your performance. Please note that it is unusual for a teacher
to alter his or her original mark, except to correct a manifest mathematical
error.
·
If
you are still dissatisfied with your mark, you may approach the course convenor
to arrange for another teacher to informally review the paper. The course convenor must be satisfied that
the student sought and obtained feedback on the assessment task in question. The reviewer will not mark the paper afresh,
but will only determine whether the mark is fair and reasonable (i.e., within
3-5 marks of what the work is worth).
The reviewer will make a non-binding recommendation to the original
teacher, either recommending that the original mark stand or that the mark be
adjusted upwards or downwards. If the teacher accepts the reviewer’s
recommendation, any substituted mark — including a lower mark — will become
final.
·
If
you are still dissatisfied after this process, you may formally appeal your
mark. Please consult university rules for
the necessary procedures. You may be
charged an administrative fee.